The Awful Storms of 30 July 1885 that 
Killed Thomas Ducklow
[Published April 25, 2010]

Thomas Ducklow, second son and fourth child of Thomas and Elizabeth Ducklow, was tragically killed by lightening while sleeping in his farmhouse bed in the early morning of July 30, 1885. He was 36 years old.  Two accounts of his death and details of the storm that killed him were originally published in the Hartford Press (Hartford, Wisconsin) on July 31st and August 7th of 1885 and are re-published here [see footnote].  They are a fascinating read.



Left: Lightening Image from Wiki Commons


Four things you might notice while reading these accounts is how values, sensitivities, and child labor laws have changed in 125 years:

(1) Newspaper writing of the day was both flowery and graphic in detail,
(2) Priority of values —the first article describes the loss of barns, hay, equipment and farm animals ahead of the loss of human life,
(3) The innocent description of two men in the same bed for the practical purpose of sleeping,
(4) The apparent starting age of a shoemaker apprentices was about 11 years old



Here are the two newspaper accounts:


Hartford Press
July 31, 1885
Page 3, Col. 4

A terrific electrical storm passed over this locality last Wednesday night.  The storm, which commenced about eleven o’clock, was preceded by a violent wind, which was followed by heavy rain and in many places hail.  There was on continuous roar of thunder accompanied by wind and incessant, flashes of lightning which lighted the whole heavens and earth for miles around which at times rendered the midnight as bright as the glare of the noonday sun.  Our citizens were soon aroused and lights were seen flashing from many windows.  Soon the sound of the fire bell was heard ringing an alarm, and the voices and hurried footsteps of the firemen were evidence that the lightning had effected its work of destrction [sic] somewhere in the neighborhood.  It was soon learned that two large barns one belonging to Eugene Anderson, and other to Bruno Gehring, just north of the city had been struck and were in flames.  Both barns with their contents were entirely consumed.  Mr. Gehring’s loss aside from his barn was about twenty-five tons of hay, and a quantity of farming tools.  Mr. Anderson’s loss was much greater, he having one valuable horse killed, and a calf smothered in the flames.  He lost about twenty tons of hay, all his farming tools, wagons, sleights and harness.  Both barns were insured.  The house of Thomas Duklow [sic] in the north part of Ashippun was struck by lightning, and Mr. Duklow [sic] was killed by the stroke while in his bed.  This is the saddest result of the storm.  A son of Mrs. Wapp of this city, who was sleeping in the same bed with Duklow as badly shocked but it is thought the will recover.  It is believed that other accidents happened in the adjoining towns, but which up to this writing have not been reported.


Hartford Press
August 7, 1885
Page 3, Col. 3-4

DEATH NOTICES

Thomas Ducklow, whom we reported in our last issue as being killed by lightning at his home in Ashippun, on Wednesday night of last week, was born in the city of New York in the year 1849, and had he lived until September next, would have been thirty six years old.  He was a single man, and his sister was keeping house for him at the time the fatal accident occurred.  There were at the time four persons in the house, all sleeping on the upper floor.  Mr. Ducklow and the hired boy, Wapp occupying one bed, and a brother of deceased in another bed in the same room, and his sister who slept in an adjoining room.  The bolt of electricity struck the chimney, and passed down to the stove pipe into the room, and near where deceased and Wapp were sleeping; leaving the stove pipe the current divided and took different directions.  The fatal portion seemed to leave the pipe in a direct line for the bed.  Coming in contact with the left leg of deceased it passed upward to his head, burning the hair from his left temple.  One of Wapp’s knees that was resting against the body of deceased was injured so that it turned black and he himself was for a time insensible.  Mr. Ducklow must have been awake at the time, as only a few minutes before he was up and closed the windows.  The deceased was well known and highly respected in this and the neighborhood where he lived, having resided in this vicinity since he was an infant one year old.  He was a shoemaker by trade, and in years past worked for different firms at his trade in this city.  In fact he served his first apprenticeship and learned his trade here with Mr. Fred Brause; some twenty five years ago.  While a resident here, as elsewhere he enjoyed the earned and honored reputation of being a sober, steady industrious and honorable man, any and all of which must be long credited to his memory by all the living who knew him in life.  He was buried at St. Paul’s cemetery on Saturday last, a large concourse of friends and neighbors being in attendance.





Right: Grave marker for Thomas Ducklow. Born Sept. 18, 1848, Died July 30, 1885.  This marker stands approximately 9 feet tall and is one of the largest in the small St. Paul's Cemetery in Ashippun Township, Dodge County, Wisconsin.


The death of son Thomas was a major milestone in Ducklow family history, as has been noted in earlier posts.  Thomas' death was the likely event that set spelling of the Ducklow name used by the greater family in America today.  Prior to his death, the spelling of the family name varied greatly, including Dukelow, Duklow, Duclow and Ducklow.  Note even the difference in spelling in the two accounts above.  Upon Thomas' death, the family decided to purchase a tombstone and have a hire a mason to chisel his name in the stone.  Naturally, the mason needed to know how the family wanted the name spelled.  Our ancestral grandparents Thomas and Elizabeth and Thomas' parents were not literate, and so the decision on the proper spelling was decided by the ten surviving adult children.  They came to choose the "Ducklow" spelling over the more common "Dukelow" spelling in use by many of their cousins.  Once the name was chiseled into Thomas' grave marker, the name became consistantly used by all of Thomas and Elizabeth's children and their descendants.  You might say it was in 1885 that the greater Ducklow family name in America became "written in stone."


 ❧

Footnote: The copyright of these articles has expired and they are in the public domain.


Are Ducklow Descendants Living Longer Over Time?
The short answer: “Yes.”
[Published April 15, 2010]

Having birth and death dates for many of our common ancestors, I became interested in seeing if, through time, the Greater Ducklow family was living longer.  The answer is “Yes.”   From births of descendants born in the 1840s to those born in 1920s the average age of death rose significantly – from age 51 to age 71. 

Of this 20-year gain in lifespan, most of the increase came in the period of the 1860s to 1880s and was primarily due to fewer infant deaths.  The sharp increase then leveled to an average death at age 66 - 67 in the 1880s through the 1910s.  Longer average life spans of those born in the 1910s would have likely continued to increase beyond age 67 but several men’s lives were cut short when killed while serving in the military [WWII].  Descendants born in the 1920s did live longer, with an average death age of 71 [see footnote 1].  There is not enough death dates to analyze average lifespan for those born after 1929.  Here is the data:

Birth Period    # of Births   % Yet Living   Avg. Death Age   Death Age Range
1840s-1850s          11                  0%                          51                       1-90
1860s-1870s          10                  0%                          66                       7-87
1880s-1890s          21                  0%                          67                       0-93
1900s-1910s          41                  3%                          67*                     0-98
1920s                      40                 25%                         71*                     15-85

What was initially surprising is how low the average death age is.  Examining the data in detail shows that the infant and youth mortality rate had big impact on the averages.  Of the 113 known births and deaths for this study, there were six deaths of children between the ages of 0 and 2.  There were five deaths of children between the ages of 3 and 19 and there where three deaths of young adults between the ages of 20 and 25.
So this leads to the question: “Of the Ducklow descendants that lived to be over 25 years old, what is the average age of death?” Here is the data:

Birth Period    # of Births   % Yet Living   Avg. Death Age   Death Age Range
1840s-1850s           8                 0%                         69                         36-90
1860s-1870s           9                 0%                         73                         52-87
1880s-1890s         18                 0%                         77                         46-93
1900s-1910s         35                 3%                         76*                       49-98
1920s                     39                25%                        72*                       36-85

Those descendants born in the 1840s-1850s who survived there childhood and early adulthood went on to live to an average age of 69, a gain of 18 years of life!  Surviving these early years also added to the average age of death in the other time periods too, but not as dramatically.
OK, so what happens if you look at all the Ducklow descendants in the study group that lived to at least age 50?  How much of an increase in the average life span occur if you live at least that long?  The answer: On average, the death age occurs in the mid- to late-seventies.  This lifespan occurs consistently for all time periods the descendant was born. Here is the data:
Birth Period    # of Births   % Yet Living   Avg. Death Age   Death Age Range
1840s-1850s           6                 0%                           79                        58-90
1860s-1870s           9                 0%                           73                        52-87
1880s-1890s          17                0%                           79                        57-93
1900s-1910s          35                3%                           78*                      51-98
1920s                      33               25%                          77*                      56-85

Interestingly, no one in the greater Ducklow family born between 1840 and 1929 has lived to be over 98 years.  It seems likely that this statistic will not hold to be true for those born after the 1920s.

 ❧

Footnote 1: Study based on 113 known birth and death dates of the greater Ducklow family born between 1840 and 1929. 

 Footnote 2: Because the early data has so few ancestors, the data was grouped into 20-year time periods [expect the 1920s] in an attempt make the data more statistically valid.

 * Footnote 3:  There is one descendant born in the 1910s who is living.  The average age of death in this period could increase slightly upon her death.  There are ten descendants born in the 1920s who are living (out of a group of 40).  The average age of death for this time period will continue rise until all have passed.

 Footnote 4: While there is data on births and deaths for time periods beyond the 1920s, there is not enough data to perform meaningful analysis.

 Footnote 5: Our common ancestral grandparents, Thomas and Elizabeth Ducklow, were not included in the study as they were born in 1812 and 1822 respectively.  The data in the study is their descendants.  Thomas died at age 79 and Elizabeth died at age 81.